The evolution of the drone defense system
Early drone defense efforts focused primarily on detection and technical mitigation. Radar upgrades, electronic warfare, and kinetic interceptors formed the backbone of counter-UAS capability. However, operational experience has shown that technology alone is insufficient without trained personnel who can react quickly, coordinate effectively, and sustain performance over time.
As drone threats diversified, defense organisations began to recognise that training had to evolve in parallel with hardware. This marked a shift in how the drone defense system was understood, from a collection of technologies to an integrated capability that includes doctrine, personnel, and training infrastructure.
Changing training demands in counter-UAS operations
Modern counter-UAS operations place significant demands on personnel. Operators must detect and engage targets with limited warning, often at close range and under cognitive pressure, as part of structured counter-UAS engagement sequences. Live drone training can support this to an extent, but it introduces constraints related to safety, airspace coordination, logistics, and high cost.
These constraints have encouraged forces to explore training solutions that allow frequent repetition and controlled escalation. Surrogate targets have emerged as a response to this need, enabling realistic airborne engagements without the complexity of operating recoverable UAV platforms.
Why surrogate targets are gaining relevance
Controlled launch mechanics
Surrogate targets are physical training targets designed to replicate key aspects of drone behaviour, such as speed, trajectory variability, and visual acquisition challenges. Their role within the drone defense system has expanded for several reasons:
- They support high-volume training without airspace restrictions
- They reduce dependency on complex electronics and recovery procedures
- They enable repeated engagement drills under consistent conditions
- They allow training to take place on standard military ranges
From a training perspective, these characteristics address gaps that technology-centric systems alone cannot fill.
Market trends shaping surrogate target adoption
Several broader trends in counter-UAS training are accelerating the adoption of surrogate targets.
Increased focus on readiness metrics
Training organisations are under growing pressure to demonstrate readiness through measurable outcomes. Surrogate targets enable structured drills where reaction time, engagement accuracy, and consistency can be assessed across repetitions within UAV performance training.
Cost and lifecycle considerations
Live drones used for training represent consumable assets. Each loss or failure carries cost implications that limit training frequency. Surrogate targets shift training expenditure toward predictable, lower-cost consumables, improving sustainability over time. Read more in our anti drone system cost analysis article.
Expansion of distributed training
Many forces now train across multiple sites or deploy training closer to operational units. Surrogate targets are well suited to this model due to their portability and minimal infrastructure requirements. Making modular training systems an easy logistical choice.
Surrogate targets as part of layered defense training
Within a layered counter-UAS framework, surrogate targets are particularly relevant to the inner layers of defense. These are the zones where manual engagement, coordination, and reaction speed determine outcomes once automated systems are saturated or degraded.
By integrating surrogate targets into layered defense exercises, forces can rehearse escalation, fallback procedures, and last-line responses under realistic conditions. This reinforces the human element of the drone defense system, which remains critical even as technology advances.
Complementing, not replacing, advanced systems
It is important to note that surrogate targets are not intended to replace live UAV training or high-end simulation. Instead, they complement these tools by filling a specific training need.
Advanced systems validate technical performance, as part of broader UAV simulator design approaches. Surrogate targets develop operator skill, confidence, and consistency. Together, they form a more complete training ecosystem that reflects how modern drone defense systems are employed in practice.
Advancing drone defense system readiness through surrogate targets
The evolution of the drone defense system reflects a broader understanding of readiness as a combination of technology, personnel, and training. As counter-UAS threats continue to diversify, surrogate targets have become an essential tool for maintaining realism, scalability, and sustainability in military drone training.
By enabling frequent, controlled, and cost-effective engagement practice, surrogate targets strengthen the human component of drone defense and support long-term operational preparedness.
Contact Nordic Clays to learn how target-based surrogate systems can support modern drone defense training requirements.